PURPOSE: To examine eligibility for modalities such as constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and modified CIMT (mCIMT) in the subacute phase after stroke and to define the share of patients who should be offered this treatment. METHODS: A prospective, repeated-measures design was used. A total of 100 consecutive patients with arm paresis 1 to 2 weeks post stroke were screened. Eligible for CIMT were patients who were cognitively intact, medically stable, and able to extend the wrist and 3 fingers 10° as a lower limit. The active range of motion was registered, and motor function was assessed by the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and the Nine Hole Peg Test at 1 to 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months post stroke. RESULTS: From 100 patients, 54 were excluded from motor assessment, mostly due to cognitive impairments. Of the remaining 46 patients, 21 (46%) were eligible according to motor function of the hand at 1 to 2 weeks post stroke, whereas in the other patients motor function was either too good or too poor. The share of patients eligible declined to 31% after 4 weeks and 15% after 3 months. Within 3 months, 60% reached reasonable dexterity, expressed by an ARAT score ≯ 51, all receiving standard rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that eligibility for CIMT or mCIMT should not be considered before 4 weeks post stroke because much improvement in arm function was shown to occur during the first month post stroke with standard rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brunner et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: