OVERVIEW: This article explores how “Taylorism,” the historical management approach created by Frederik Winslow Taylor, can be adapted to tackle contemporary management challenges posed by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). Drawing on a longitudinal and collaborative study based on five multi-industry workshops conducted over one year, we developed a three-dimensional framework for managing GenAI in organizations. This framework offers a three-part action plan for practitioners: (1) establish dedicated GenAI labs to orchestrate experimentation and learning; (2) explore GenAI in a structured, capability-driven manner; and (3) redefine organizational roles and workflows to support generativity. Grounded in historical parallels with Taylor’s scientific management principles, our findings empirically extend existing GenAI management frameworks by revealing how organizations operationalize them. We discuss implications for practice and suggest avenues for future research at the intersection of GenAI, technology management, and organizational innovation. We present actionable insights for managers navigating the integration of GenAI technologies, emphasizing collective actions and cross-functional collaboration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bordas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: