Cross-Sectional (n=776)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and identify risk factors associated with MetS among Korean office workers, this cross-sectional study was conducted with 776 office workers. The prevalence of MetS was 13.5%; elevated waist circumference (27.5%), elevated fasting glucose (23.1%), elevated triglycerides (22.2%), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (13.4%), and elevated BP (9.4%). Having any medical health problems (OR = 3.98, 95% CI: 2.01-7.85), more knowledge of MetS (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.56), higher BMI (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.30-1.57), current smoking (OR = 3.78, 95% CI: 1.04-13.73), and physical inactivity (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.21-8.58) were significantly associated with increased likelihood of MetS. Addressing the influence of these factors on MetS could lead to the development of workplace-based intervention strategies to encourage lifestyle changes and prevent the risk of MetS among Korean office workers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryu et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome (n=776). Lifestyle and health risk factors (medical health problems, MetS knowledge, higher BMI, current smoking, physical inactivity) vs. Absence of risk factors was evaluated on Prevalence and likelihood of metabolic syndrome (MetS) (OR 3.98, 95% CI 2.01-7.85).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: