Why the study?
The role of aspirin in primary or secondary prophylaxis of VTE has been debated as risk-benefit tradeoffs between aspirin and anticoagulants have changed.
Does aspirin prevent venous thromboembolism in medical and surgical patient populations?
Does aspirin prevent venous thromboembolism in medical and surgical patient populations?
This review evaluates the evidence for aspirin in the primary and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and its bleeding risk compared to anticoagulation.
Aspirin's role in VTE prevention remains incompletely defined; leaves open need for dedicated RCTs in medical and surgical populations.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE; deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) is a well-established cause of morbidity and mortality in the medical and surgical patient populations. Clinical research in the prevention and treatment of VTE has been a dynamic field of study, with investigations into various treatment modalities ranging from mechanical prophylaxis to the direct oral anticoagulants. Aspirin has long been an inexpensive cornerstone of arterial vascular disease therapy, but its role in the primary or secondary prophylaxis of VTE has been debated. Risk-benefit tradeoffs between aspirin and anticoagulants have changed, in part due to advances in surgical technique and postoperative care, and in part due to the development of safe, easy-to-use oral anticoagulants. We review the proposed mechanisms in which aspirin may act on venous thrombosis, the evidence for aspirin use in the primary and secondary prophylaxis of VTE, and the risk of bleeding with aspirin as compared with anticoagulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diep et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: