Why the study?
Low radiofrequency powers require longer ablation durations to achieve a target LSI and may cause conductive esophageal heating, prompting evaluation of higher versus lower power protocols.
Does 40 W radiofrequency power compared to 20 W power reduce esophageal temperature alerts and improve procedural success in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Comparison
4 combinations of RF power and target LSI (20 W/LSI 4, 20 W/LSI 5, 40 W/LSI 4, and 40 W/LSI 5)
Design
Prospective randomized study
Follow-up
29 months
Authors
Loading...
Low-power posterior wall ablation may reduce esophageal risk but requires validation; leaves open optimal LSI-guided strategies in larger trials.
Does 40 W radiofrequency power compared to 20 W power reduce esophageal temperature alerts and improve procedural success in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Posterior wall ablation with 40 W is associated with similar esophageal temperature alerts but lower AF recurrence at 29 months compared to 20 W.
Leo et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: