Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates a new brief depression measure in a Mexican sample, suggesting reliable screening for depressive symptoms.
Most instruments used to assess depression have been developed in sociocultural contexts that differ substantially from those of Spanish-speaking Latin American populations. To address this limitation, the present study developed and evaluated a new brief measure of depressive symptomatology for use in northeastern Mexico. The study included 414 participants (Mage = 27.37 years, SD = 13.72). An initial pool of 23 items, grounded in interbehavioral psychology, was developed and subsequently evaluated by a panel of 58 expert judges. Based on content-validity analyses, the instrument was reduced to 15 items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a final four-item, one-factor solution. The final model demonstrated adequate fit to the data (χ2/df = 0.281, AGFI = 0.993, NNFI = 1.015, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000, 90% CI [0.000, 0.094], and SRMR = 0.008). Evidence of discriminant and convergent validity was supported by a negative correlation with the Subjective Happiness Scale (r = −0.294, p < 0.01) and a positive correlation with the seven-item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-7; r = 0.273, p < 0.01). Construct reliability was satisfactory (H = 0.841). Overall, the findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the reliability and validity of the proposed instrument as a brief screening measure of depressive symptomatology in a Mexican sample, mostly from Nuevo León.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cadena et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: