Key result
Escitalopram did not significantly improve overall depression scores (SMD -0.70) but significantly reduced anxiety scores (SMD -0.64) in patients with coronary heart disease.
Why the study?
Comorbid depression and anxiety worsen prognosis in coronary heart disease, but evidence on the psychological and cardiovascular effects of escitalopram in this population is limited.
Does escitalopram improve psychological symptoms and reduce cardiovascular events in adults with coronary heart disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=603)
Does escitalopram improve psychological symptoms and reduce cardiovascular events in adults with coronary heart disease?
Escitalopram effectively reduces anxiety symptoms in patients with coronary heart disease without increasing cardiovascular risk, though its effects on overall depression and long-term cardiovascular outcomes remain uncertain.
May reduce anxiety in coronary heart disease without raising cardiovascular risk; leaves open overall depression efficacy and long-term outcomes.
Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) often have comorbid depression and anxiety, which worsen prognosis. Escitalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is used for these symptoms, but evidence on its psychological and cardiovascular effects in CHD is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated its effects on psychological symptoms and cardiovascular outcomes in CHD. We systematically searched five databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of escitalopram vs. control in adults with CHD. Data were extracted to avoid double counting; extended follow-up data were analyzed separately. Outcomes included depression/anxiety scale changes, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization. Random-effects models and sensitivity analyses were used. Five RCTs were included. Overall depression score change was not significant (SMD = -0.70, 95% CI -1.57 to 0.18), but medium-term (12–24 weeks) follow-up showed improvement (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.20). Anxiety scores significantly decreased with escitalopram (SMD = -0.64, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.17). Pooled data from two studies were compatible with reductions in MACE (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.94) and myocardial infarction (RR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.96), however, approximately 90% of the pooled weight came from the post-treatment follow-up of a single trial, so these findings are hypothesis-generating. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for all-cause mortality or revascularization. Escitalopram appears effective for selected psychological symptoms in CHD without evidence of major cardiovascular harm; current evidence is insufficient to establish a cardiovascular benefit, and the observed MACE and myocardial infarction reductions are hypothesis-generating. Treatment should aim primarily to improve psychological well-being and quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary heart disease (n=603). Escitalopram vs. Placebo or usual care was evaluated on Overall depression score change (SMD -0.70, 95% CI -1.57 to 0.18). Escitalopram did not significantly improve overall depression scores (SMD -0.70) but significantly reduced anxiety scores (SMD -0.64) in patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: