Exploratory development of sex-specific models predicts urinary retention in patients post-renal biopsy, indicating a need for standardized measures.
To develop and internally evaluate exploratory sex-specific models for clinically documented short-term urinary retention (UR) during mandatory post-biopsy immobilization after percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB). A total of 566 adults who underwent PRB at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai between January 2023 and November 2024 were screened. The retrospective outcome was clinically documented UR requiring catheterization and meeting a record-based volume or time criterion. Routine pre-catheterization bladder scanning was not available for all patients. Univariate analyses were descriptive; each sex-specific logistic model was restricted to four clinically selected, routinely available pre-biopsy predictors and was internally evaluated using five-fold cross-validation and bootstrap calibration. Ten patients with oliguria were excluded, leaving 556 for analysis; clinically documented UR was recorded in 78 patients (14.03%). The four-variable male model included age > 60 years, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), diabetes mellitus (DM), and preoperative voiding training; BPH, DM, and absence of training were statistically significant. The four-variable female model included hypertension, history of UR, preoperative voiding training, and bowel movement within 24 h before PRB; hypertension, absence of training, and no bowel movement were statistically significant. Cross-validated AUCs were 0.793 for males and 0.748 for females. These nomograms are hypothesis-generating models of a clinically documented care-pathway outcome. Their moderate internal discrimination does not overcome the limitations of retrospective outcome ascertainment or the low event-to-predictor ratio in the male cohort. Standardized objective outcome measurement and external validation are required before clinical use. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: