Key result
Higher Naples Prognostic Score linked to ~146% higher odds of prevalent paroxysmal AF.
Why the study?
The Naples Prognostic Score has shown prognostic value in cardiovascular disease, but its association with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in outpatients had not been evaluated.
Is the Naples Prognostic Score independently associated with the presence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in a cardiology outpatient population?
Case-Control (n=429)
No
Is the Naples Prognostic Score independently associated with the presence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in a cardiology outpatient population?
Odds Ratio: 2.46 (95% CI 1.79–3.36)
p-value: p=<0.001
The Naples Prognostic Score, a composite of inflammatory and nutritional markers, is independently associated with the presence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in cardiology outpatients.
Background and objectives: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is a common arrhythmia associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Inflammation and nutritional imbalance contribute to arrhythmogenesis. The Naples Prognostic Score (NPS), derived from inflammatory and nutritional laboratory markers, has shown prognostic value in cardiovascular disease, but its association with PAF in outpatients has not been evaluated. This study assessed whether NPS is independently associated with the presence of PAF in a cardiology outpatient population. Methods: This retrospective case–control study included 429 patients evaluated between January 2023 and January 2025. Among them, 155 had documented PAF and 274 patients in sinus rhythm served as controls. Demographic, laboratory, and echocardiographic data were collected. NPS was calculated using serum albumin, total cholesterol, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio. Multivariable logistic regression identified variables independently associated with PAF. Results: Among patients with calculable NPS (n = 386), NPS was higher in the PAF group (1.92 ± 0.98 vs. 0.96 ± 0.93; p < 0.001), and high NPS was more frequent (26.0% vs. 7.8%; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, NPS remained independently associated with documented prevalent PAF (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.79–3.36; p < 0.001). Conclusions: NPS was independently associated with documented prevalent PAF in this outpatient cohort. These findings do not establish diagnostic or predictive utility, and prospective longitudinal studies are required to determine whether NPS is associated with incident PAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yılmaz et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (n=429). Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) vs. Lower NPS was evaluated on Presence of documented prevalent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.79-3.36, p=<0.001). A higher Naples Prognostic Score was independently associated with the presence of documented prevalent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in an outpatient cardiology cohort (OR 2.46).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: