Explores how edge profile configuration improves mechanical properties in aluminum alloy joints, indicating better outcomes with novel designs.
In the current study, the effects of edge profile configuration and reinforcement with Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia (YSZ) particles on the microstructure, crystallographic texture, and mechanical properties of friction stir welded AA6061-T651 aluminum alloy joints are investigated. A novel profile-edge joint configuration is employed to improve material flow and particle dispersion in friction stir welding, and is compared with a conventional straight-edge joint configuration. Electron Backscattered Diffraction (EBSD) analysis showed that the profile-edge configuration results in better microstructural refinement of the joint, with an average grain size of 6.6 μm compared with 8.4 μm for the straight-edge joint. Moreover, the amount of high-angle grain boundaries increases from 40.1% to 46.3% due to improved recrystallization. Texture analysis has shown that shear texture components are more pronounced in the profile-edge joint, where the maximum texture intensity is 13.6 times that of a random distribution. Microanalysis of the profile-edge joint using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDX) showed that yttria-stabilized zirconia particles were successfully incorporated into the stir zone with a relatively uniform distribution. Phases α-Al, Mg 2 Si, Al 5 FeSi, zirconia, and yttria-stabilized zirconia have been identified by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis. The profile-edge configuration resulted in an improved hardness of up to 105 HV, compared with 101 HV for the straight-edge configuration. The mechanical properties are considerably improved in the profile-edge joint, with an ultimate tensile strength of 348 ± 12.9 MPa, a yield strength of 311 ± 10.4 MPa, and an elongation of 12.8 ± 2.5%, resulting in a joint efficiency of 92–95%. Fractographic analysis indicates a ductile fracture with evenly distributed dimples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: