Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates digital documentation training in heritage professionals, indicating improved capacity for conservation.
This paper presents a tailored pedagogical approach to digital heritage documentation in contexts where heritage is under threat. It was developed during the July–August 2024 UNESCO/ICOMOS mission to Kyiv, Ukraine, within the UNESCO/Japan Funds-in-Trust project “Support for Ukraine in Culture and Education through UNESCO / Emergency response for World Heritage and cultural property: damage assessment and protection,” in relation to the UNESCO World Heritage property “Kyiv: Saint-Sophia Cathedral and Related Monastic Buildings, Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra.” The mission focused on the Metropolitan’s Residence and the Bell Tower of the Saint-Sophia Cathedral Complex. In parallel with the production of documentation for emergency preparedness and future conservation assessment, the mission implemented a dedicated capacity-building programme for the staff of the National Conservation Area “Sophia of Kyiv.” The paper discusses five interconnected components of this training programme: preparation before the mission, structure and content of the sessions, training activities and didactic material, learning outcomes and targeted competencies, and adaptive responses to a conflict-affected environment. The case study shows that integrating training into an active documentation workflow can strengthen both the immediate value of the records produced and the longer-term capacity of local professionals to support conservation, monitoring, and risk preparedness at World Heritage sites under threat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ortiz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: