Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved task-solving efficiency in LLM agents, suggesting a shift from learned signals to compiled structures.
Production LLM agents serve repeated requests against fixed applications - booking, CRM, project tracking - where goals recur as templates. Current methods allocate test-time search effort using learned signals (process reward models, self-evaluation), which cost extra model calls, degrade under distribution shift, and cannot be audited. We propose backward completion pools: for each goal template, a relaxed backward structure is compiled once from the application's action schema; at serving time a deterministic query binds each request's parameters, and every step of the agent's forward search is joined against the pool, yielding a completion-value estimate at zero model-call cost. The estimate never prunes: it softly modulates each branch's expansion rate under an activity floor, for which we prove completeness in the limit and, under bounded per-node inflation, bounded suboptimality. On Blocksworld with an optimal-cost oracle, the individuated join signal ranks states with Spearman rho = 0.967 versus 0.76-0.79 for same-cost LLM self-evaluation (p < 10^-7). On WorkBench (690 tasks, five workplace applications), all 69 goal templates compile and binding grounds 100% of tasks exactly; ungrounded shape statistics beat LLM signals for cross-request budgeting, while grounded joins dominate within-task discrimination. End-to-end at matched budget (17 calendar tasks x 4 budgets x 3 independent runs, every arm's signal calls charged to the same budget), grounded reallocation solves 29% versus uniform's 16% at the sparsest feasible budget (paired sign test +7/-0, p = 0.016 uncorrected), converging at generous budgets. Self-evaluation, paying its own evaluation calls under the same accounting, solves no tasks in that regime and trails at every budget. The gain is consistent with horizon extension: at budget 16, uniform solves 0/9 length-4 tasks; grounded solves 5/9. Compiled goal structure can thus substitute for learned guidance exactly where serving budgets are tight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: