Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates transaction throughput and latency in a Cloud-Fog-IoT system, suggesting enhanced scalability and security for smart cities.
Smart city operations increasingly depend on timely and secure data management, yet Fog-IoT ecosystems face persistent issues related to latency, energy consumption, and data integrity. This study proposes a Cloud-Fog-IoT architecture integrated with a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG)-based blockchain to enhance scalability and security. Experimental evaluation was conducted using a 10-node peer-to-peer topology (8:2 transaction mix of reads to writes, 1 MB block size, 500 ms block timeout) across Raspberry Pi 4B devices (4GB RAM, gigabit Ethernet). Compared to a cloud-IoT baseline (centralized AWS m5.large, mean network latency 70 ms) and a fog-only configuration (Intel NUC edge nodes, direct aggregation), the proposed system demonstrated a mean transaction throughput of 560 tx/s (95% CI: ), compared with 430 tx/s (95% CI: ) and 350 tx/s (95% CI: ), respectively. Mean end-to-end latency was reduced to 220 ms (95% CI: ), compared to 290 ms and 310 ms for cloud-IoT and fog-only systems. Energy consumption decreased to 0.22 Joules/tx (95% CI: [0.21, 0.23]), versus 0.37 and 0.30 Joules/tx for the baselines. The architecture supported 15 concurrent nodes versus 9 for the cloud-IoT system and achieved a transaction success rate of 99% (cloud-IoT: 90%; fog-only: 91%). Results indicate robust and scalable performance for secure smart city deployments, with consistent definitions and units throughout the manuscript.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samanta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: