Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares evapotranspiration products in Hong Kong, indicating variability and trends for wetland management.
Accurate evapotranspiration (ET) estimates are essential for hydrological assessment, water-resource management, and wetland conservation, yet global ET products often disagree in heterogeneous coastal environments. This study compared ERA5-Land, GLDAS Noah, TerraClimate, MERRA-2, MOD16A2GF, and PML_V2 across Hong Kong during 2001–2020 and examined their applicability to the Mai Po Marshes. The products were standardized to annual water-depth equivalents and evaluated using descriptive statistics, the Friedman repeated-measures test, Holm-adjusted Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, lag-1 autocorrelation analysis, and standard and Hamed–Rao modified Mann–Kendall tests. Spatial uncertainty was quantified using the inter-product coefficient of variation and summarized by land-cover class. Mean annual ET ranged from 530.09 mm yr−1 for GLDAS to 1182.80 mm yr−1 for ERA5-Land. Product differences were significant (χ2(5) = 94.74, p < 0.001; Kendall’s W = 0.947), and all pairwise contrasts remained significant after Holm correction. GLDAS was the only product with a significant increasing trend (Sen’s slope = 4.88 mm yr−2, p < 0.001), while the remaining products showed no significant trends. Within Mai Po, ET estimates differed among products but showed negligible variation among aggregated wetland habitat classes. The findings support uncertainty-aware, multi-product interpretation for regional ET monitoring and cautious application to compact coastal wetlands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quayson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: