Why the study?
Does educational attainment affect survival after acute myocardial infarction?
Does educational attainment affect survival after acute myocardial infarction?
Higher educational attainment is positively associated with both absolute and relative survival after acute myocardial infarction, highlighting socioeconomic disparities in post-MI outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Educational disparities in post-MI survival warrant targeted secondary prevention; this Level 4 analysis leaves open causal mechanisms and intervention effects.
BACKGROUND: Although there is a broad societal interest in socioeconomic differences in survival after an acute myocardial infarction, only a few studies have investigated how such differences relate to the survival in general population groups. We aimed to investigate education-specific survival after acute myocardial infarction and to compare this with the survival of corresponding groups in the general population. METHODS: Our study included the entire population of Norwegian patients admitted to hospitals for acute myocardial infarction during 2008-2010, with a 6- year follow-up period. Patient survival was measured relative to the expected survival in the general population for three educational groups: primary, secondary and tertiary. Education, sex, age and calendar year-specific expected survival were obtained from population life tables and adjusted for the presence of infarction-related mortality. RESULTS: Six-year patient survivals were 56.3% (55.3-57.2) and 65.5% (65.6-69.3) for the primary and tertiary educational groups (95% CIs), respectively. Also 6-year relative survival was markedly lower for the primary educational group: 70.2% (68.6-71.8) versus 81.2% (77.4-84.4). Throughout the follow-up period, patient survival tended to remain lower than the survival in the general population with the same educational background. CONCLUSION: Both patient survival and relative survival after acute myocardial infarction are positively associated with educational level. Our findings may suggest that secondary prevention has been more effective for the highly educated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klitkou et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: