Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Photoinhibition of photosynthesis was monitored by means of chlorophyll a fluorescence in leaves of plants growing in 60–80 m 2 light gaps in a moist tropical lowland forest located on Barro Colorado Island in central Panama. In these forest gaps, photon flux density was low (less than 100 μmol photons m −2 s −1 ) during most of the day, but increased on clear days to 1.7‐1.8 mmol photons m −2 s −1 for 1–2 h during midday. Nine species representing different taxa and life‐forms were examined. Leaves of all species exhibited substantial photoinhibition in situ during high light exposure, as manifested by a decrease in the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence emission, F V /F M . Recovery (reversion of fluorescence quenching) took place in the shade following high light exposure. The major part of recovery occurred in a fast phase within about 1 h after the high light period. A slow phase of recovery proceeded for another 4–5 h until sunset. After 30–60 min of recovery in the shade, calculated rates of PSII electron transport remained significantly (5–15%) reduced in comparison to rates obtained prior to high light exposure; after about 2 h of recovery, inhibition was negligible. All species responded to the high light periods and following shade periods in a very similar manner. It is concluded that photoinhibition and recovery exhibited by these gap leaves reflect a dynamic regulatory mechanism of thermal energy dissipation that allows plants of different life‐forms to cope with periods of high light in tropical forest gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krause et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: