Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nexans experience in developing all CSD processes for coated conductors with the YBCO/CGO/LZO/Ni-5% W RABITS architecture is summarized. The chosen CC architecture has a principal disadvantage that the next layer only clones, but more often deteriorates the out-of-plane texture of the previous layer (in average by ~ 20% for LZO). Depending on the quality of RABITS, this may increase the amount of grain boundaries (GBs) not transparent for the supercurrent close to the percolation limit for the current-breaking path, which explains low and poorly reproducibleJc. Modifying the buffer architecture by introducing CGO seed layer suppresses deterioration of the out-of-plane texture. Another approach, extending the range of acceptable grain misorientations by selective doping YBCO GBs with Ca is shown not possible using the current MOD-TFA process because of decomposition of initial Y123 to disordered Y124 and Y247 during pyrolysis of the second MOD layer. Possible ways of further development are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rikel et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: