A configuration interaction study was completed on the 1 ∑ + states of the LiH molecule using a nonorthogonal one‐electron basis in elliptical coordinates. A few wave functions with highly optimized parameters were obtained for the X 1 ∑ + and A 1 ∑ + states and combined to construct a larger wave function which gave improved results for both states over a wide range of R values. The third and fourth roots are also reported since the wave function is extensive enough to give good upper bounds for the two states. Calculations were completed for 34 values R in the range 1 ≤ R ≤ 10 bohr (b). The calculated X 1 ∑ + curve has a minimum at Re = 3.060b (3.015b), with E ( Re ) = −8.0556 Hartree (H) (−8.0704), μ( Re ) = −5.89 debye (d) (−5.88d) and μ/( R d μ/ dR )| Re = 1.75 (1.80 ± 0.3). For the A 1 ∑ + state, Re = 4.928b (4.906b), E ( Re ) = −7.9372H(−7.9496H), μ( Re ) = +3.96d and μ/( R d μ/ dR )| Re = −‐0.471. The values in parentheses are experimental results for comparison. The numerical vibrational and rotational analysis agreed well with experiment for both states. The A 1 ∑ + state exhibited a pronounced negative anharmonicity. Both states show strong interaction of three zeroth‐order configurations, the nature of which changes considerably with R . The thus far unobserved second excited state has two minima, a metastable one at R = 3.70b and another at R ≈ 10.00b. The third excited state also appears to have a minimum at R ≈ 7.00b.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: