No AccessJournal of UrologyCLINICAL UROLOGY: Original Articles1 Feb 2003Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy For Cancer With Level I Renal Vein Involvement MIHIR M. DESAI, INDERBIR S. GILL, ANUP P. RAMANI, SURENA F. MATIN, JIHAD H. KAOUK, and JOSE MIGUEL CAMPERO MIHIR M. DESAIMIHIR M. DESAI More articles by this author , INDERBIR S. GILLINDERBIR S. GILL Requests for reprints: Section of Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Urological Institute, A100, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, Ohio 44195. Financial interest and/or other relationship with Endocare. More articles by this author , ANUP P. RAMANIANUP P. RAMANI More articles by this author , SURENA F. MATINSURENA F. MATIN More articles by this author , JIHAD H. KAOUKJIHAD H. KAOUK More articles by this author , and JOSE MIGUEL CAMPEROJOSE MIGUEL CAMPERO More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)63940-7AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Venous involvement develops in 5% to 10% of patients with renal cell carcinoma and is generally considered a relative contraindication to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. To our knowledge we report the initial clinical series of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma associated with level I renal vein thrombus. Materials and Methods: At our 2 institutions 8 patients each underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for level I microscopic renal vein thrombus (group 1) and level I gross thrombus (group 2). In all 8 group 2 patients the level I thrombus was preoperatively diagnosed by computerized tomography. Mean renal tumor size in groups 1 and 2 was 7.8 and 12.4 cm., respectively. After controlling the renal artery the renal vein was secured by firing an endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis stapler on its collapsed, uninvolved proximal part adjacent to the vena cava. Intraoperative, postoperative and pathological parameters were assessed in the 2 groups. Results: In group 1 laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was technically successful in all 8 patients. Mean operative time was 3.1 hours, mean estimated blood loss was 382 cc and mean hospital stay was 1.9 days. In 1 patient each a soft tissue and a vascular margin was positive for cancer. At a mean follow up of 19.5 months (range 2 to 36) metastatic disease occurred in 3 cases (38%). In group 2 laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was technically successful in 7 cases with open conversion in 1. Mean operative time was 3.3 hours, mean estimated blood loss was 354 cc and mean hospital stay was 2.3 days. Surgical soft tissue and the renal vein vascular margin of the transected vein were negative for cancer in all 8 cases. At a mean followup of 9.4 months (range 5 to 16) pulmonary metastasis developed in 1 patient (13%). Conclusions: Although it is an advanced procedure, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in patients with level I renal vein thrombus is feasible, safe and follows established oncological principles. References 1 : Long-term followup after surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma extending into the right atrium. J Urol1996; 155: 448. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Renal vein and vena cava involvement does not affect prognosis in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Oncology2001; 61: 10. Google Scholar 3 : Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: evaluation of efficacy and safety: a multicenter experience. Urology1998; 52: 773. Google Scholar 4 : Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer2001; 92: 1843. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 5 : Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland Clinic experience. J Urol2000; 163: 1665. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Retroperitoneal laparoscopy versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol1999; 161: 1776. Abstract, Google Scholar 7 : Intentional resection of the diaphragm during cytoreductive laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol2002; 167: 48. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in a patient with level I renal vein tumor thrombus. J Urol2000; 163: 1243. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: the Washington University experience. J Urol1996; 155: 1180. Link, Google Scholar 10 : TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma: Workgroup No. 3. Union International Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer1997; 80: 992. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 11 : Stage specific guidelines for surveillance after radical nephrectomy for local renal cell carcinoma. J Urol1998; 159: 1163. Link, Google Scholar 12 : Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol2002; 167: 469. Link, Google Scholar 13 : Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with level II vena caval thrombectomy: survival porcine study. J Urol2002; 168: 2629. Link, Google Scholar 14 : Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with vena caval and right atrial thrombectomy utilizing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. J Urol2002; 167: 20. abstract 80. Google Scholar From the Section of Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, and Department of Urology, Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile© 2003 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGill I, Metcalfe C, Abreu A, Duddalwar V, Chopra S, Cunningham M, Thangathurai D, Ukimura O, Satkunasivam R, Hung A, Papalia R, Aron M, Desai M and Gallucci M (2015) Robotic Level III Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy: Initial SeriesJournal of Urology, VOL. 194, NO. 4, (929-938), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015.Eun D, Bhandari A, Boris R, Lyall K, Bhandari M, Menon M and Rogers C (2008) A Novel Technique for Creating Solid Renal Pseudotumors and Renal Vein-Inferior Vena Caval Pseudothrombus in a Porcine and Cadaveric ModelJournal of Urology, VOL. 180, NO. 4, (1510-1514), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008.Weiss R (2007) Editorial CommentJournal of Urology, VOL. 179, NO. 2, (460-460), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2008.KIM J, NG C, RAMANI A, SPALIVIERO M, HERTS B, KAOUK J and GILL I (2018) Laparoscopic Radical Adrenalectomy With Adrenal Vein Tumor Thrombectomy: Technical ConsiderationsJournal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 3, (1223-1226), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2004. Volume 169 Issue 2 February 2003 Page: 487-491 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2003 by American Urological Association, Inc.Keywordskidneythrombosislaparoscopynephrectomyrenal veinsMetrics Author Information MIHIR M. DESAI More articles by this author INDERBIR S. GILL Requests for reprints: Section of Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Urological Institute, A100, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, Ohio 44195. Financial interest and/or other relationship with Endocare. More articles by this author ANUP P. RAMANI More articles by this author SURENA F. MATIN More articles by this author JIHAD H. KAOUK More articles by this author JOSE MIGUEL CAMPERO More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desai et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: