Key result
Both resistance and endurance training improved flow-mediated dilation (p=0.006) with no difference between modalities (p=0.92), though intra-individual responses varied by NOS3 genotype.
Why the study?
Does endurance versus resistance training differentially improve vascular function in healthy males, and is this associated with NOS3 genotype?
RCT (n=35)
randomized, balanced cross-over
Does endurance versus resistance training differentially improve vascular function in healthy males, and is this associated with NOS3 genotype?
Both endurance and resistance training improve vascular function in healthy males, with individual responses potentially influenced by NOS3 genotype.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Genotype may guide training choice for vascular gains; leaves open personalized prescriptions pending larger trials.
We used a within‐subject, cross‐over design study to compare the impact of 4‐weeks' resistance (RT) versus endurance (END) training on vascular function. We subsequently explored the association of intra‐individual effects of RT versus END on vascular function with a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the NOS3 gene. Thirty‐five healthy males (21 ± 2 years old) were genotyped for the NOS3 rs2070744 SNP and completed both training modalities. Participants completed 12 sessions over a 4‐week period, either RT (leg‐extension) or END (cycling) training in a randomized, balanced cross‐over design with a 3‐week washout period. Participants performed peak oxygen uptake (peak VO 2 ) and leg‐extension single‐repetition maximum (1‐RM) testing, and vascular function assessment using flow‐mediated dilation (FMD) on 3 separated days pre/post‐training. Peak VO 2 increased after END ( p < 0.001), while 1‐RM increased after RT ( p < 0.001). FMD improved after 4‐weeks’ training (time effect: p = 0.006), with no difference between exercise modalities (interaction effect: p = 0.92). No relation was found between individual changes (delta, pre‐post) in FMD to both types of training (R 2 = 0.06, p = 0.14). Intra‐individual changes in FMD following END and RT were associated with the NOS3 SNP, with TT homozygotes significantly favoring only END ( p = 0.016) and TC/CC tending to favor RT only ( p = 0.056). Although both training modes improved vascular function, significant intra‐individual variation in the adaptation of FMD was found. The association with NOS3 genotype suggests a genetic predisposition to FMD adapting to a specific mode of chronic exercise. This study therefore provides novel evidence for personalized exercise training to optimize vascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dawson et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=35). Resistance training (leg-extension) vs. Endurance training (cycling) was evaluated on Vascular function assessment using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (p=0.92). Both resistance and endurance training improved flow-mediated dilation (p=0.006) with no difference between modalities (p=0.92), though intra-individual responses varied by NOS3 genotype.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: