Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three recent experiments demonstrate the efficacy of using mail contacts to convince address-based samples of general public households to respond to a Web survey (Smyth et. al. 2010; Messer and Dillman 2011). Results show that mailing the Web request first to respondents, followed by a paper questionnaire at a later date, produced Web responses from over 1/3 of sampled respondents; the paper follow-up resulted in an additional 14-18%. This “Web+mail” design also obtained demographically dissimilar respondents via each mode: Web respondents were significantly younger with higher levels of income and education than mail respondents. Thus, it seems beneficial to offer mail as an alternative to Web to increase response rates and enhance the representativeness of respondents. However, as research suggests, it could also be the case that the mail obtains higher item nonresponse compared to Web, which raises concerns about the additional value mail might add in this type of Web+mail mixed mode design. In this paper, we examine some of the determinants of item nonresponse
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Messer et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: