BACKGROUND: There is limited research for xenograft biologic mesh performance in the setting of infection despite widespread use and significant associated costs. DESIGN: The authors retrospectively reviewed an FDA database for reported xenograft adverse events (AEs). All meshes were used in the setting of abdominal wall reconstruction from 1997 to 2008. RESULTS: The authors identified 150 AEs. Permacol and Collamend comprised 75% (n = 112) of reported cases. Main AEs included acute mechanical failure (42%; n = 63), mesh disintegration (32%; n = 48), and poor mesh integration (13%; n = 20); 80% of cases were described as infected, and nearly 90% of AEs required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Major complications are reported to the FDA for xenograft biologic meshes. Cross-linked meshes had the most AE reports to the FDA. The intrinsic properties of meshes and how they relate to infection-related outcomes are poorly understood. The findings from this FDA database review point toward a need to carefully evaluate these products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harth et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: