Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Resolving the time scales of energy and charge transfer processes in light harvesting systems is pivotal to the advancement of artificial photosynthesis and next-generation optoelectronic devices. Herein, we present a detailed time-resolved investigation of a light-harvesting triad composed of Ni-doped CsPbBr 3 perovskite nanocrystals (Ni:PNCs), rhodamine B (RhB), and methyl viologen (MV 2+ ). This triad is strategically selected for establishing a sequential relay mechanism-Förster resonance energy transfer coupled with photoinduced electron transfer. Ni 2+ doping imparts enhanced structural rigidity resulted in improved ethanol tolerance of the PNCs. An energy transfer efficiency of ∼88% from Ni:PNC to RhB demonstrates a highly efficient energy transfer process. MV 2+ binds to Ni:PNC with an apparent association constant of ∼10 6 M –1, nearly an order of magnitude higher than that of RhB (∼10 5 M –1 ), confirming its preferential surface interaction. Nonlinear photoluminescence quenching behavior of Ni:PNC with MV 2+ has been elucidated with Perrin Formalism. A nearly 2-fold reduction in the Stern–Volmer quenching constant for the Ni:PNC–RhB hybrid compared to pristine Ni:PNC highlights the role of RhB. Femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy reveals ultrafast electron transfer from the photoexcited Ni:PNC–RhB complex to MV 2+, leading to the formation of MV +• radical species. The rate of energy transfer and rate of electron transfer for Ni:PNC–RhB with MV 2+ are measured to be 1.7 × 10 9 s –1 and 1.7 × 10 10 s –1, respectively. These results provide mechanistic insights into energy-transfer-coupled electron transfer dynamics and place the Ni:PNC-based triad as a promising candidate for solar fuel conversion processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: