Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three profiles are constructed through the Oligocene succession of the borderland between Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. The profiles illustrate the geometric relationships between Rupelian and Chattian successions and the lateral and vertical variations within the Rupelian and Chattian deposits. The end-Rupelian profile between Central Belgium and the Achterhoek area in the Netherlands shows a rather uniform thickness distribution. This is in sharp contrast to the fault controlled sedimentation during the Chattian as represented on an end-Chattian profile between the same areas. Within the Chattian succession several lithostratigraphic units can be identified and correlated using a dense net of geophysical well logs. Remarkably similar subdivisions are found in the different tectonic blocks, suggesting eustatic sea-level fluctuations. In the central part of the subsiding area the Chattian deposits are largely continental to deltaic. Laterally,these deposits developed into marine glauconitic sediments. The end-Chattian profile between Bonn and Asten in the Netherlands runs approximately parallel with the subsidence axis. The cyclicity expressed by facies alternations due to a periodically shifting coastline can be correlated over the different blocks again suggesting the involvement of eustatic controls. On this last profile, an anomalous geometry is due to SE-NW stress-induced movements along the Variscan Aachen overthrust.The three lithological profiles are meant to represent a frame for formal stratigraphic subdivisions and nomenclature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hager et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: