Key result
High electronic frailty index linked to ~90% higher mortality in pulmonary hypertension.
Why the study?
The long-term prognosis of cardio-metabolic and renal complications, as well as mortality in patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary hypertension, was unclear.
Does an electronic frailty index (eFI >= 9.5) developed using a random survival forest model predict all-cause mortality and complications in patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary hypertension?
Cohort (n=2,560)
Yes
Does an electronic frailty index (eFI >= 9.5) developed using a random survival forest model predict all-cause mortality and complications in patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary hypertension?
An electronic frailty index built with a random survival forest model using routine electronic health record data accurately predicts long-term mortality and cardio-renal-metabolic complications in patients with pulmonary hypertension without requiring invasive hemodynamic testing.
Background The long-term prognosis of the cardio-metabolic and renal complications, in addition to mortality in patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary hypertension, are unclear. This study aims to develop a scalable predictive model in the form of an electronic frailty index (eFI) to predict different adverse outcomes. Methods This was a population-based cohort study of patients diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension between January 1st, 2000 and December 31st, 2017, in Hong Kong public hospitals. The primary outcomes were mortality, cardiovascular complications, renal diseases, and diabetes mellitus. The univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied to identify the significant risk factors, which were fed into the non-parametric random survival forest (RSF) model to develop an eFI. Results A total of 2,560 patients with a mean age of 63.4 years old (interquartile range: 38.0–79.0) were included. Over a follow-up, 1,347 died and 1,878, 437, and 684 patients developed cardiovascular complications, diabetes mellitus, and renal disease, respectively. The RSF-model-identified age, average readmission, anti-hypertensive drugs, cumulative length of stay, and total bilirubin were among the most important risk factors for predicting mortality. Pair-wise interactions of factors including diagnosis age, average readmission interval, and cumulative hospital stay were also crucial for the mortality prediction. Patients who developed all-cause mortality had higher values of the eFI compared to those who survived ( P < 0.0001). An eFI ≥ 9.5 was associated with increased risks of mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.70–2.12; P < 0.0001]. The cumulative hazards were higher among patients who were 65 years old or above with eFI ≥ 9.5. Using the same cut-off point, the eFI predicted a long-term mortality over 10 years (HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.53–1.90; P < 0.0001). Compared to the multivariable Cox regression, the precision, recall, area under the curve (AUC), and C-index were significantly higher for RSF in the prediction of outcomes. Conclusion The RSF models identified the novel risk factors and interactions for the development of complications and mortality. The eFI constructed by RSF accurately predicts the complications and mortality of patients with pulmonary hypertension, especially among the elderly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Newly diagnosed pulmonary hypertension (n=2,560). Electronic frailty index (eFI) >= 9.5 derived via Random Survival Forest (RSF) model vs. Electronic frailty index (eFI) < 9.5 (and multivariable Cox regression model for predictive performance) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.70-2.12, p=<0.0001). An RSF-derived electronic frailty index >= 9.5 was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.70-2.12, P<0.0001) in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: