Key result
Neuromuscular training-based cardiac rehabilitation improved Incremental Shuttle Walk Test performance compared to classic strength training at 6-month follow-up (MD 214; 95% CI 61 to 367).
Why the study?
To evaluate the effects of a cardiac rehabilitation programme based on neuromuscular training compared with classic rehabilitation strength training in patients diagnosed with ACS.
Does a cardiac rehabilitation programme based on neuromuscular training improve functional capacity in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
RCT (n=30)
Double-blind
random
No
Does a cardiac rehabilitation programme based on neuromuscular training improve functional capacity in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
A cardiac rehabilitation program based on neuromuscular training provides greater medium-term improvements in functional capacity and cardiorespiratory fitness compared to classic strength training in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Neuromuscular training should be prioritized in cardiac rehabilitation for acute coronary syndrome; extends comparative evidence on training modalities.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of a cardiac rehabilitation programme based on neuromuscular training (NMT) compared with classic rehabilitation strength training (CRST) in patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). DESIGN: Preliminary randomised, double-blinded, parallel clinical trial. SETTING: University health clinic in Valencia, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with ACS. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to one of two groups at random: the NMT group (n = 15) and the CRST group (n = 15). All patients attended the 20 sessions of the exercise programme. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT). The secondary outcomes were the Chester Step Test (CST), the 30-Second Chair Stand Test (30CST), and hip flexor dynamometry. Assessments were made at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: The NMT group showed a greater improvement in the ISWT than the CRST group, both at post-treatment {mean 648 [standard deviation (SD) 197] vs 493 (SD 219), mean difference 155, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1 to 310} and at follow-up [732 (SD 183) vs 518 (SD 222), mean difference 214, 95% CI 61 to 367]. The secondary outcomes showed significant between-group differences in favour of the NMT group at 6-month follow-up, except for the 30CST. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings indicate that a cardiac rehabilitation programme based on NMT may improve functional capacity in terms of patient performance, cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength. Moreover, the improvements were maintained at medium-term follow-up. This could help improve the design of rehabilitation sessions, considering factors associated with performing everyday activities in patients affected by ACS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04246008. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valtueña‐Gimeno et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=30). Neuromuscular training (NMT) vs. Classic rehabilitation strength training (CRST) was evaluated on Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) (MD 214, 95% CI 61 to 367). Neuromuscular training-based cardiac rehabilitation improved Incremental Shuttle Walk Test performance compared to classic strength training at 6-month follow-up (MD 214; 95% CI 61 to 367).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: