Objectives The transfer of melanosomes from melanocytes to neighbouring keratinocytes is critical to protect the skin from the deleterious effects of ultraviolet A ( UVA ) and ultraviolet B ( UVB ) irradiation; however, the initial factor(s) that stimulates melanosome transfer remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the induction of retinal‐dependent calcium (Ca 2+ ) influx in melanocytes ( MC s) by UVA or UVB irradiation and the effect of transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 1 ( TRPM 1) (melastatin1)‐related Ca 2+ influx on melanosome transfer. Materials and methods Primary human epidermal MC s were exposed to physiological doses of UVB or UVA light and loaded with a calcium indicator Fluo‐4 dye. The change of intracellular calcium of MC s was monitored using a two‐photon confocal fluorescence microscopy. MC s were co‐cultured with human epidermal keratinocytes ( KC s) in the absence or presence of voriconazole (a TRPM 1 blocker) or calcium chelators. MC s were also transfected with TRPM 1 si RNA for silencing the expression of TRPM 1 gene. The melanosome transfer in the co‐cultured cells was quantitatively analysed using flow cytometry and was further confirmed by immunofluorescent double‐staining. The protein levels and distributions of TRPM 1, OPN 3 and OPN 5 in MC s were measured by Western blotting or immunofluorescent staining. Results The retinal‐dependent Ca 2+ influx of UVA ‐exposed melanocytes differed greatly from that of UVB ‐exposed melanocytes in the timing‐phase. The protein expression of TRPM 1 in mono‐ and co‐cultured MC s was dose‐dependently up‐regulated by UVA and UVB . TRPM 1 si RNA ‐mediated knockdown and the blockage of TRPM 1 channel using a putative antagonist (voriconazole) significantly inhibited melanosome transfer in co‐cultures following UVA or UVB exposure. Conclusions The distinct time‐phases of Ca 2+ influx in MC s induced by UVA or UVB contribute to the consecutive stimulation of melanosome transfer, thereby providing a potent photoprotection against harmful UV radiation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: