Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this commentary, I advocate for strict relations between Marr's levels of analysis. Under a strict relationship, each level is exactly implemented by the subordinate level. This yields two benefits. First, it brings consistency for multilevel explanations. Second, similar to how a sculptor chisels away superfluous marble, a modeler can chisel a computational-level model by applying constraints. By sculpting the model, one restricts the (potentially infinitely large) set of possible algorithmic- and implementational-level theories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Blokpoel (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: