Key result
Precooling with cold-water immersion did not affect the chronotropic index (P=0.301) but reduced peak heart rate compared to control (178 vs 188 beats/min; P=0.001) during incremental exercise.
Why the study?
Does precooling reduce cardiovascular and metabolic strain during incremental exercise in men?
Does precooling reduce cardiovascular and metabolic strain during incremental exercise in men?
p-value: p=0.301
Precooling lowers overall heart rate during incremental exercise without altering the rate of rise in heart rate, though it may reduce time to fatigue.
Precooling may blunt peak heart rate without altering its rate of rise; leaves open effects on strain or performance in clinical populations.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of precooling on the chronotropic index defined as the slope of the heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake during incremental exercise. Ten men performed incremental exercise following 2 conditions: control (rest in a thermoneutral laboratory, 21.5 ± 0.7 °C; performed first) and precooling (cold-water immersion, 23.1 ± 0.2 °C). Prior to exercise, core temperature was significantly lower for precooling (36.6 ± 0.3 °C) compared with control (37.1 ± 0.4 °C; p < 0.001) and remained lower throughout exercise (p < 0.05). Time to volitional fatigue during the incremental exercise test was significantly longer in the control (914 ± 97 s) compared with precooling (889 ± 97 s; p = 0.015). Precooling reduced HR by 8-10 beats·min(-1) compared with control throughout exercise (peak HR: precooling, 178 ± 9 beats·min(-1); control, 188 ± 6 beats·min(-1); p = 0.001). Oxygen uptake did not differ between conditions (p > 0.05). The chronotropic index did not differ between conditions (p = 0.301); however, the y intercept was significantly lower (p = 0.009) for precooling (53.6 ± 11.0) compared with control (67.3 ± 11.0). Thus, the benefit of precooling was a lower HR that was maintained throughout exercise rather than a reduced rate of rise in HR. These results suggest the potential use of precooling to mitigate cardiovascular strain in individuals working at elevated metabolic rates. However, the reduced exercise time warrants consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2013) studied this question. Precooling (cold-water immersion) vs. Control (rest in a thermoneutral laboratory) was evaluated on Chronotropic index (slope of the heart rate and oxygen uptake during incremental exercise) (p=0.301). Precooling with cold-water immersion did not affect the chronotropic index (P=0.301) but reduced peak heart rate compared to control (178 vs 188 beats/min; P=0.001) during incremental exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: