Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article presents a comparison of methods of evaluation of establishing the rankings of variants on the example of the location of P&R lots (car parks) in Bydgoszcz (a medium-sized city in Poland). The methods to be compared were based on the procedure defined by municipal authorities in the public procurement (a simple evaluation based on a weighted average) on the one hand, and at the same time, on the well-known methodology of multi-criteria decision making. The assessment was carried out for 15 predefined locations, and both methods used the same set of criteria and sub-criteria. In order to determine the value of the criteria, among others, the travel model of the Bydgoszcz agglomeration built in the VISUM tool was used. As a result, it was possible to simulate the creation of P&R lots in selected locations. The preferences of the decision-maker (the municipal authorities) were expressed in a direct interview with their representatives. As a result of all the calculation work, two final rankings were obtained for each method, which allowed to draw final conclusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fierek et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: