In this paper, the task is to check why we do question the validity of a certain explanation of behaviour even if at the same time this explanation serves us as a frame of reference in our everyday professional research and action. We mean here the most trivial and, simultaneously, the most problematic explanation of behaviour in terms of legal rules. In general, the paper addresses the most important of theoretical problems in sociology of law, that is, does sociology of law have at its disposal a theory at all. In particular, as law of laws (LL) this explanation was selected as it seems to be of fundamental role for sociology of law in the whole.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacek Kurczewski (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: