Why the study?
Does the proportion of Medicaid patients in a physician's practice affect their self-reported use of warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Does the proportion of Medicaid patients in a physician's practice affect their self-reported use of warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Physicians with a higher proportion of Medicaid patients self-report lower rates of warfarin prescription for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, highlighting socioeconomic disparities in practice patterns.
Higher Medicaid-practice proportion was associated with lower self-reported warfarin use in nonvalvular AF; leaves open socioeconomic drivers and needs prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: This study examines whether social and economic factors affect physician practice and attitude with regard to warfarin anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We identified physicians in Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and Prince George's County who (1) had written one or more prescriptions for a digitalis compound during the preceding year, and (2) were classified as general practitioners, family practice specialists, internists, or cardiologists. All 358 physicians fulfilling these criteria were surveyed by questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 43%. Physicians who wrote 15% or more of their digitalis prescriptions for Medicaid patients said they used warfarin at significantly lower rates for patients with nonvalvular AF than other (66% versus 79%, P <0.01). The opposite pattern was seen with regard to aspirin. There were no significant differences in practice pattern between physicians located in urban vs. suburban counties. CONCLUSION: In our sample, self-reported anticoagulant practices for patients with nonvalvular AF were associated with the percentage of digitalis prescriptions written for Medicaid patients. In this metropolitan area, anticoagulant therapy was reportedly prescribed for approximately 75% of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bush et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: