Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
How should potential research outputs be compared, in order to set priorities, when a diverse range of goals and outputs is possible? This paper introduces a multiple-criteria weighting method, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which can be applied in ex post research evaluation. AHP transforms qualitative subjective judgments into quantitative data (weights). It is a decision analysis technique. The method is illustrated with a simple hypothetical example from a sorghum research program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartwich et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: