Comparative analysis reveals substantial discrepancies and opposing vegetation trends across coarse NDVI datasets, highlighting the need to reconcile satellite products in time-series research.
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) has been widely applied for monitoring vegetation dynamics. However, NDVI values are known to be profoundly affected by various external factors. In this study, the variation of NDVI values and trends among the several long-term NDVI datasets with resolution of 1, 4 and 8 km were assessed to understand the differences between the available datasets. The assessment items were 1) Pearson’s correlation coefficient, 2) trend map and breakpoint spatial similarities and 3) comparison of NDVI from Landsat and Flux tower in 2007–2015. The comparison revealed a maximum correlation coefficient of 0.67 among NDVI datasets and average spatial similarity of 37.2% among the trend maps estimated from NDVI datasets. Furthermore, there was a possibility of having significantly opposite trends between two trend maps from different NDVI products. Comparisons with NDVI from vegetation pixel in Landsat 5 TM and 8 OLI resulted in the R2 between 0.06 and 0.68 and RMSE of 0.07–0.2, while comparison with NDVI from flux tower data yielded the RMSE of 0.04–0.41, although the R2 was relatively weak at 0–0.18. Our study highlights the possibility of differences among NDVI datasets, and suggests that these differences should be reconciled especially in time-series analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arjasakusuma et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: