Key result
A standardized admission e-mail from hospitalists to PCPs significantly increased communication (P<0.001) but did not decrease length of stay, 30-day readmissions, or 30-day ED visits.
Why the study?
Does a standardized admission e-mail from hospitalists to PCPs improve communication and reduce healthcare utilization in inpatient admissions?
Does a standardized admission e-mail from hospitalists to PCPs improve communication and reduce healthcare utilization in inpatient admissions?
A standardized admission e-mail from hospitalists to primary care providers increased communication but did not significantly improve clinical outcomes such as length of stay or 30-day readmissions.
OBJECTIVES: Communication between hospitalists and primary care providers (PCPs) upon discharge has been much discussed, but the transition from outpatient to inpatient has received less attention. We questioned whether a brief, standardized e-mail from the hospitalist to the PCP upon admission could facilitate information exchange, increase communication, elucidate PCP preferences, and improve outcomes. METHODS: This prospective single-center study with a preintervention-to-postintervention design involved 300 inpatient admissions from June 2015 through October 2015 in the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System. Hospitalists e-mailed an encrypted notification of admission along with standardized questions to PCPs within 1 day of admission. Measurements included the number of communications between PCPs and hospitalists, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, 30-day emergency department (ED) utilization rates, PCP preferences with regard to communication, and follow-up. RESULTS: values were <0.001, 0.67, 0.4, and 0.79, respectively. PCPs preferred e-mail communication upon discharge (40%) to telephone (25%) or instant messaging (13%), and 39% wanted a follow-up appointment within 2 weeks, regardless of what transpired. CONCLUSIONS: A hospitalist-led transition-of-care intervention designed to improve communication and information exchange between PCPs and hospitalists at the time of admission demonstrated that encrypted e-mail could be used as a tool to obtain useful additional medical and psychosocial information and to better understand PCP attitudes and preferences. The increased level of communication did not yield statistically significant decreases in LOS, 30-day readmission rates, or 30-day post-discharge ED visits, however.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holleck et al. (2017) studied Inpatient admissions (n=300). Standardized encrypted e-mail notification of admission from hospitalist to PCP vs. Preintervention (standard care) was evaluated on Number of communications between PCPs and hospitalists, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, and 30-day ED utilization rates (p=<0.001, 0.67, 0.4, and 0.79, respectively). A standardized admission e-mail from hospitalists to PCPs significantly increased communication (P<0.001) but did not decrease length of stay, 30-day readmissions, or 30-day ED visits.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: