Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the contribution of Turkish authors to the main neurosurgical literature, with a focus on the leadership roles of Turkish neurosurgeons, by analyzing publications in the 10 most influential neurosurgery journals between 2015 and 2024. METHODS: A total of 46,616 articles from the top neurosurgery journals-ranked by impact factor-were reviewed. Data on Turkish authorship, authorship position, specialty, article type, subspecialty, and affiliation were collected. RESULTS: Among the reviewed articles, 1226 (2.63%) included at least 1 Turkish author; 1033 (84.3%) involved at least 1 Turkish neurosurgeon. Turkish authors held first and last authorship in 68.2% and 68.6% of these articles, respectively, with both positions occupied in 58.7%. Most contributions were original research (69.4%). Subspecialty analysis showed strong representation in general neurosurgery, neurovascular, and spine, while functional and pediatric neurosurgery were underrepresented. While 62.5% of articles were produced solely in Turkey, 37.5% involved international institutions, most frequently from the United States and Germany. Turkish contribution varied significantly by journal (P < 0.001), but not by quartile (P = 0.328) or impact factor (P = 0.1600). CONCLUSIONS: Turkish neurosurgeons consistently contribute to the global neurosurgical literature, especially through original research and leadership roles. Enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration and increasing visibility in high-impact journals will be key to expanding the academic presence of Turkish neurosurgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Topuz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: