Key result
Combined use of inhaled nitric oxide and milrinone significantly improved central venous pressure decrement (19.6% vs 15.2%, P<0.05) compared to iNO alone after Fontan procedure.
Why the study?
Does the combination of inhaled nitric oxide and milrinone improve pulmonary hemodynamics and reduce withdrawal failure compared to inhaled nitric oxide alone in patients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance after the Fontan procedure?
RCT (n=31)
Does the combination of inhaled nitric oxide and milrinone improve pulmonary hemodynamics and reduce withdrawal failure compared to inhaled nitric oxide alone in patients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance after the Fontan procedure?
The combined use of inhaled nitric oxide and milrinone provides additive benefits for stabilizing pulmonary hemodynamics and reducing withdrawal failure in patients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance after the Fontan procedure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports combined iNO-milrinone for post-Fontan hemodynamic management; extends randomized evidence on vasodilator synergy in single-ventricle physiology.
Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been used for patients with increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) shortly after Fontan operation, but repeat deterioration of PVR during or shortly after its withdrawal remains a major concern. Milrinone, a phosphodiesterase type 3 (PDE3) inhibitor, can also reduce PVR for postoperative patients with pulmonary hypertension. We hypothesized that iNO, in conjunction with milrinone, can provide additive benefits for pulmonary hemodynamics and reduce the occurrence of iNO withdrawal failure/rebound. Thirty-one patients with marked elevation of transpulmonary pressure gradient (TPG, >10 mm Hg) or central venous pressure (CVP, >15 mm Hg) after modified fenestrated Fontan operation were prospectively randomized into two groups, that is, group iNO (iNO at approximately 10 ppm, n = 15) and group iNO + Mil (iNO at approximately 10 ppm and milrinone at 0.5 microg/kg/min, n = 16). Hemodynamics, arterial blood oxygenation, and occurrence of withdrawal failure/rebound were compared between the two groups. Combined application of iNO and milrinone resulted in (i) more significant decrement of CVP (19.6 +/- 3.5% in group iNO + Mil vs. 15.2 +/- 4.6% in group iNO, P < 0.05) and TPG (18.2 +/- 4.8% in group iNO + Mil vs. 15.3 +/- 2.6% in group iNO, P < 0.05), (ii) more significant increment of systolic systemic arterial pressure (8.7 +/- 2.7% in group iNO + Mil vs. 5.2 +/- 3.1% in group iNO, P < 0.05), and (iii) more significant improvement of arterial oxygen saturation (9.3 +/- 3.2% in group iNO + Mil vs. 6.8 +/- 2.8% in group iNO, P < 0.01). Occurrence of iNO withdrawal failure during its weaning or rebound after its discontinuation was significantly lower in group iNO + Mil. The combined use of iNO and milrinone provided additive benefits as compared with exclusive use of iNO for patients with elevated PVR after Fontan procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance after Fontan procedure (n=31). Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and milrinone vs. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) alone (approximately 10 ppm) was evaluated on Decrement of central venous pressure (CVP) (p=<0.05). Combined use of inhaled nitric oxide and milrinone significantly improved central venous pressure decrement (19.6% vs 15.2%, P<0.05) compared to iNO alone after Fontan procedure.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: