Key result
RAS blockers show no mortality benefit over other antihypertensives in patients with diabetes.
Why the study?
Do renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers reduce the risk of hard cardiovascular and renal outcomes compared with other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes mellitus?
Meta-Analysis (n=25,414)
Randomized controlled trials
Yes
Do renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers reduce the risk of hard cardiovascular and renal outcomes compared with other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes mellitus?
In patients with diabetes (largely without kidney disease or heart failure), RAS blockers are not superior to other antihypertensive classes (thiazides, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers) for preventing hard cardiovascular or renal outcomes, supporting guidelines that allow any first-line antihypertensive class in diabetic patients without nephropathy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RAS blockers confer no outcome advantage over other antihypertensives in diabetes; confirms consensus allowing any first-line class without nephropathy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes with use of renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers compared with other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases for randomized trials of RAS blockers versus other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes mellitus. Outcomes were death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, heart failure, revascularization, and end stage renal disease. RESULTS: The search yielded 19 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 25,414 participants with diabetes for a total of 95,910 patient years of follow-up. When compared with other antihypertensive agents, RAS blockers were associated with a similar risk of death (relative risk 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.05), cardiovascular death (1.02, 0.83 to 1.24), myocardial infarction (0.87, 0.64 to 1.18), angina pectoris (0.80, 0.58 to 1.11), stroke (1.04, 0.92 to 1.17), heart failure (0.90, 0.76 to 1.07), and revascularization (0.97, 0.77 to 1.22). There was also no difference in the hard renal outcome of end stage renal disease (0.99, 0.78 to 1.28) (power of 94% to show a 23% reduction in end stage renal disease). CONCLUSIONS: In people with diabetes, RAS blockers are not superior to other antihypertensive drug classes such as thiazides, calcium channel blockers, and β blockers at reducing the risk of hard cardiovascular and renal endpoints. These findings support the recommendations of the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension and eighth Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure to also use other antihypertensive agents in people with diabetes but without kidney disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bangalore et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (predominantly with hypertension and without heart failure) (n=25,414). Renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers (ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) vs. Other antihypertensive agents (calcium channel blockers, thiazide diuretics, and beta-blockers) was evaluated on All-cause death (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05). Renin angiotensin system blockers showed a similar risk of all-cause death (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.05) and other cardiovascular/renal outcomes compared with other antihypertensives in diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: