This paper focuses on retrofitting strategies for tall pre-Northridge steel moment-frame buildings with vulnerable beam-to-column moment connections. Ten retrofit schemes of a 20-story building, originally designed according to the 1994 UBC, are developed in accordance with ASCE-41 by upgrading the brittle beam-to-column moment-resisting connections, or adding conventional/buckling-restrained brace elements to the existing moment-frame bays. Using nonlinear pushover and time-history analyses under near-source ground motion records from past earthquakes and synthetic ground motion records from three large-magnitude scenario earthquakes, the retrofit schemes are compared against the baseline model. While the baseline model is a total loss in 1331 of the 4014 scenario earthquake analysis cases, the worst of the braced retrofit schemes experiences a total loss in fewer than a third of these cases (426), clearly demonstrating the effectiveness of adding braces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjornsson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: