The interrelationship between housing and land prices has long been a puzzle in China. Using a panel dataset of 286 prefecture-level cities from 2011 to 2020, we construct a spatial simultaneous-equations model and estimate it with the feasible generalized spatial three- stage least squares (FGS3SLS) approach. Results show significant mutual causality and spatial spillovers between housing and land prices. A 1% rise in local housing prices increases local land prices by about 0.71%, with a comparable effect from neighboring housing markets. Regional heterogeneity is evident: the housing-to-land price effect is strongest in western cities (0.93%) and weaker in eastern cities (0.53%), reflecting differences in local government incentives and market structures. By capturing both bidirectional causality and spatial-temporal variation, this study offers new evidence on the mechanisms linking housing and land markets and provides insights for regionally differentiated housing and land policies in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: