Key result
Left ventricular noncompaction with reduced ejection fraction was associated with significantly worse global and mean segmental strain parameters compared to preserved ejection fraction and healthy controls.
Why the study?
There is a lack of cardiac MRI data on left ventricular strain and rotational parameters in LVNC patients with reduced ejection fraction across different levels of EF deterioration.
How do cardiac MRI strain and rotational parameters change at different levels of left ventricular ejection fraction deterioration in patients with left ventricular noncompaction?
Cross-Sectional (n=93)
How do cardiac MRI strain and rotational parameters change at different levels of left ventricular ejection fraction deterioration in patients with left ventricular noncompaction?
In patients with left ventricular noncompaction, cardiac MRI strain and rotational parameters progressively worsen as ejection fraction decreases, though no LVNC-specific strain pattern was identified.
Global LV strain/rotation decline with EF in LVNC without specific pattern; hypothesis-generating for CMR-FT utility beyond EF.
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of cardiac MRI information on left ventricular (LV) strain and rotational parameters of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Thus, we sought to use feature tracking (FT) to describe these changes at different levels of EF deterioration. METHODS: We included 31 adult LVNC patients with reduced LV EF (Group B, EF < 50%) without any comorbidities or concomitant cardiac diseases, 31 age- and sex-matched LVNC patients with good EF (Group A, EF > 50%) and 31 healthy controls. Group B was divided according to LV EF into two subgroups (Group B-1: EF 35-50%, Group B-2: EF < 35%). Their global longitudinal, circumferential (GCS), and radial (GRS) strains; LV segmental strains; LV apical and basal rotation values; and patterns and degree of LV dyssynchrony were measured. RESULTS: All of the global and mean segmental strain parameters were significantly worse in Groups B, B-1 and B-2 than in Group A and in the controls. The LV mechanical dispersion increased as LV EF decreased. The degree of apical rotation was the highest in the control group, almost the same in Group A and the lowest and in the reverse direction in Group B-2. A rotational pattern, clockwise-directed rigid body rotation (RBR), was found in 39% of the Group B patients, and a counterclockwise-directed RBR was found in 26% of the Group A patients. CONCLUSIONS: The strain values and rotational parameters changed as the EF decreased. These changes affected the global LV, and we did not identify an LVNC-specific strain pattern.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szűcs et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) (n=93). Reduced ejection fraction (EF < 50%) vs. Preserved ejection fraction (EF > 50%) and healthy controls was evaluated on Global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains; LV segmental strains; LV apical and basal rotation values; and LV dyssynchrony. Left ventricular noncompaction with reduced ejection fraction was associated with significantly worse global and mean segmental strain parameters compared to preserved ejection fraction and healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: