This article draws on neo-Weberian 'Positional Conflict Theory' to theorise the recent introduction in New Zealand of a National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) as an attempt by the Labour-led coalition to change the way the competition for positional advantage is organised. It is argued that the NCEA is unlikely to significantly alter the nature of positional competition. The NCEA is part of a Qualifications Framework chat seeks to provide ladders of opportunity for working-class students. The impact of the NCEA on positional competition is discussed in relation to the proposed Matriculation Diploma in the United Kingdom. The position of those who have traditionally fared poorly in formal examinations is analysed through their involvement in a market-led training system developed by the State to replace traditional working class networks for gaining jobs. This system clearly works for some students but the question remains as to whether this is a selection mechanism for low-skill jobs rather than advantaging all young, working-class people.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rob Strathdee (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: