This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: This study aims to characterize optic disc hypoplasia in congenital aniridia using ultra-wide-field imaging (UWFI) and nonmydriatic retinal photography (NMRP). We also investigated the relation between optic disc hypoplasia and foveal hypoplasia. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with PAX6 -related aniridia in a National Referral Center, who underwent UWFI, NMRP, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) . The disc diameter (DD) and the disc-to-fovea distance (DF) were measured. The DD:DF ratio was used to assess the relative size of the optic disc. The analyses were carried with respect to paired age- and sex-matched healthy controls. SD-OCT was used for foveal hypoplasia grading (from 1 to 4) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) analysis. RESULTS: Mean manual DD:DF ratio was 0.33 (95% CI: 0.31-0.35) in aniridia patients versus 0.37 (95% CI: 0.36-0.39) in control patients (n = 20, P = 0.005) measured on NMRP and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.30-0.35) in aniridia patients versus 0.37 (95% CI: 0.37-0.39) in control patients (n = 26, P < 0.0001) when assessed on UWFI. Mean semiautomated DD:DF ratio measured on UWFI in aniridia patients was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.29-0.33) versus 0.37 (95% CI: 0.36-0.38) in control patients ( P < 0.0001). Also, a negative correlation was found significant between the grade of foveal hypoplasia and the mean semiautomated DD:DF ratio (r = -0.52, 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.15, P = 0.0067). Finally, a significant negative correlation was found between the peripapillary temporal RNFL thickness and the grade of foveal hypoplasia ( P = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: The DD:DF ratio is significantly reduced in PAX6 -related aniridia patients and correlates with the severity of foveal hypoplasia. This ratio is a valuable tool for optic disc hypoplasia assessment in congenital aniridia, especially when provided semiautomatically by UWFI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dentel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: