Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging is crucial to the diagnosis and monitoring of recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). In a retrospective cohort study of 34 patients, we compared FAF imaging platforms varying in field size (30° and 55°: blue/SW-AF and NIR-AF; 200°: ultrawide-field, UWF-AF), excitation wavelength (488 nm, blue/SW-AF; 532 nm, UWF-AF and 787 nm, NIR-AF) and image processing. Due to reduced absorption of 532 nm and 787 nm light by macular pigment, foveal sparing was more readily demonstrable by green/UWF-AF and NIR-AF imaging. Prominent in green/UWF-AF images is a central zone of relatively elevated AF that is continuous inferonasal with a demarcation line bordering lower AF nasally and higher AF temporally. This zone and border are more visible in STGD1 than in healthy eyes and more visible with green/UWF-AF. With the development of AF flecks, inferonasal retina is initially spared. Central atrophic areas were larger in NIR-AF images than in blue/SW-AF and green/UWF-AF images and the presence of a contiguous hyperAF ring varied with imaging modality. Flecks visible as hyperAF foci in blue/SW-AF images were also visible in green/UWF-AF but were often hypoAF in NIR-AF. Since disease in STGD1 often extends beyond the 30° and 55° fields, green/UWF-AF has advantages including for pediatric patients. The imaging platforms examined provided complementary information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: