Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A recent paper by Richman (1986) provides a very useful review of the ideas of rotation in principal component analysis, in the context of climatology. However, the paper also raises a number of points which are open to discussion. The present note comments on a number of these points, and aims to give a balanced view of the usefulness of principal component analysis, both with and without rotation, in climatology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ian T. Jolliffe (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: