Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The growing interest in the modeling of superconductors has led to the development of effective numerical methods and software. One of the most utilized approaches for magnetoquasistatic simulations in applied superconductivity is theHformulation. However, due to the large number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) present when modeling large and complex systems (e.g. large coils for fusion applications, electrical machines, and medical applications) using the standardHformulation on a desktop machine becomes infeasible. TheHformulation solves the Faraday's law formulated in terms of the magnetic field intensityHusing edge elements in the whole modeling domain. For this reason, a very high resistivity is assumed for the non-conducting domains, leading to an ill-conditioned system matrix and therefore long computation times. In contrast, theH-φformulation uses theHformulation in the conducting region, and theφformulation (magnetic scalar potential) in the surrounding non-conducting domains, drastically reducing DOFs and computation time. In this work, we use theH-φformulation in 2D for the magnetothermal (AC losses and quench) analysis of stacks of REBCO tapes. The same approach is extended to a 3D case for the AC loss analysis of a twisted superconducting wire. All the results obtained by simulations inSparselizardare compared with results obtained with COMSOL. Our custom tool allows us to distribute the simulations over hundreds of CPUs using domain decomposition methods, considerably reducing the simulation times without compromising accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riva et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: