Key result
Stent implantation in human mammary artery organ culture induced neointimal thickening mainly due to smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, which was maximal at day 14.
Why the study?
Does direct stenting compared to stenting after predilatation affect endothelial cell preservation and neointimal hyperplasia in human mammary artery organ cultures?
Does direct stenting compared to stenting after predilatation affect endothelial cell preservation and neointimal hyperplasia in human mammary artery organ cultures?
Direct stenting preserves endothelium better than stenting after predilatation in an ex vivo human mammary artery model, demonstrating that neointimal thickening is an intrinsic vessel wall response.
Direct stenting may preserve endothelium better in ex vivo models; leaves open effects on neointimal hyperplasia in patients.
Although the use of stents has limited the incidence of restenosis, in-stent restenosis remains an important problem. In-stent restenosis is the result of a healing process that induced neointimal hyperplasia through mechanisms that are still not understood. The aim of this study was to analyze the histological consequences of the healing process following stent implantation. Internal mammary arteries from atheroslerotic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were stented and maintained in culture for 0-28 days. Stent implantation after predilatation induced an extensive loss of endothelial cells whereas direct stenting preserved endothelium between the struts. Morphometric analysis shows that stent placement induced neointimal thickening. Smooth muscle alpha-actin labeling indicates that neo-intimal formation was mainly due to proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells. Smooth muscle cell proliferation, assessed by MIB-1 staining, was maximal at day 14 after stent insertion. Human mammary artery organ culture thus provides valuable information on histological consequences of stent implantation with or without predilatation regarding endothelial cell disappearance and neointimal hyperplasia. These data also demonstrate that neointimal thickening induced by stent implantation comprises an intrinsic component resulting from the vessel wall response to stent insertion and suggest that blood factors could play an amplifying but not necessary role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guérin et al. (2004) studied Atherosclerosis. Stent implantation (with or without predilatation) vs. Direct stenting vs predilatation was evaluated on Histological consequences (endothelial cell loss, neointimal thickening, smooth muscle cell proliferation). Stent implantation in human mammary artery organ culture induced neointimal thickening mainly due to smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, which was maximal at day 14.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: