Key result
Leaflet resection resulted in a significantly smaller range of postoperative leaflet motion compared to chordal replacement (18.8±9.8° vs. 39.8±19.7°, p<0.01).
Why the study?
The impact of leaflet resection versus chordal replacement on postoperative valve morphology in mitral valve plasty has not been clearly determined.
Does leaflet resection compared to chordal replacement affect postoperative valve morphology in patients undergoing mitral plasty for P2 lesions?
Observational (n=20)
Does leaflet resection compared to chordal replacement affect postoperative valve morphology in patients undergoing mitral plasty for P2 lesions?
Absolute Event Rate: 18.8% vs 39.8%
p-value: p=<0.01
Chordal replacement may better preserve mitral leaflet motion compared to leaflet resection in patients undergoing mitral valve plasty for P2 lesions.
Postoperative mitral morphology differences after resection versus replacement for P2 prolapse remain unclear; leaves open optimal technique selection.
Objective: There are two different types of procedures to correct the prolapsed valve in the mitral valve plasty, but the impact of these procedures on the postoperative valve morphology has not been clearly determined. We conducted the echocardiographic study to compare the postoperative valve morphology between patients undergoing leaflet resection and chordal replacement. Methods: Among 36 patients undergoing mitral plasty for P2 lesion, the retrospective echocardiographic analysis could be made in 20 patients. The valve morphology was compared between 9 patients undergoing leaflet resection (LR group) and 11 patients undergoing chordal replacement (CR group). The leaflet motion of the affected valve was quantitatively evaluated with the angle between mitral annular plane and the leaflet at maximum open or closed position. Results: There were no differences in the maximum open angle (LR group: 53.5±15.3° vs. CR group: 65.5±11.6°, p=0.07) or the maximum closed angle (34.6±12.4° vs. 25.7±14.7°, p=0.15) between the two groups. The mobility of the leaflet was restricted at the semi closed position in most LR patients. On the other hand, the mobility was preserved in most CR patients, but was restricted at open position in three CR patients. The range of leaflet motion was significantly smaller in LR group than CR group (18.8±9.8° vs. 39.8±19.7°, p<0.01). Conclusions: Our echocardiographic results revealed that leaflet resection technique resulted in restricted leaflet motion at the semi-closed position. Chordal replacement technique may preserve the leaflet motion of the affected valves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuge et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Mitral valve prolapse (P2 lesion) (n=20). Leaflet resection vs. Chordal replacement was evaluated on Range of leaflet motion (p=<0.01). Leaflet resection resulted in a significantly smaller range of postoperative leaflet motion compared to chordal replacement (18.8±9.8° vs. 39.8±19.7°, p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: