This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE: Accuracy in in vivo assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) status is crucial for predicting the response to HER2-targeted therapies in breast cancer. This study assessed the safety, feasibility, and diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-ABH2, a reengineered affibody molecule with radionuclide labeling, for HER2 expression in breast cancer using SPECT/CT imaging, compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients suspected of primary breast cancer were enrolled in this prospective, single-center study from March to July in 2023. Each participant underwent SPECT/CT imaging with 99mTc-ABH2 SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT. The imaging results were validated against immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization, employing visual scores and quantitative values for analysis. RESULTS: Optimal imaging contrast was observed around 2 hours postinjection of 99mTc-ABH2. Among the evaluated 27 patients with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization findings, the 99mTc-ABH2 SPECT/CT visual evaluation displayed a sensitivity of 71.4%, specificity of 72.2%, and accuracy of 71.9%. Using an SUVmax cutoff of 2.32, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting HER2 status were 92.86%, 72.22%, and 81.25%, respectively. Notably, 99mTc-ABH2 precisely identified all immunohistochemistry (3+) tumors and showed increased uptake in bone and lymph node metastases. Meanwhile, 18F-FDG PET/CT showed no significant difference in uptake between HER2 (2+/3+) and HER2 (0/1+) tumors (P = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: This study validated 99mTc-ABH2 SPECT/CT as a promising diagnostic tool for precise HER2 assessment. The robust sensitivity for immunohistochemistry (3+) tumors and the visualization of metastases highlight its diagnostic significance, potentially impacting patient outcomes positively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: