Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prompted by an example in the medical field we are led to consider linear structural relationships between all pairs of a set of p(>2) random variables Xi(i = 0, ... , p 1). This model has relevance in assessing the relative calibrations and relative accuracies of a set of p instruments, each designed to measure the same characteristic, on a common group of individuals. In such a situation we need to estimate the slope and intercept parameters in the linear structural relationships, and the error variances, as measures of calibration and accuracy, respectively, for the p instruments. In contrast to the case p = 2, no problem occurs of unideiltifiability of the parameters and the maximum likelihood approach is feasible. This is illustrated for the case p = 3, but rather simpler estimators are presented for p > 3, together with their asymptotic standard errors. The case p = 3 may be viewed as a new and useful form of instrumental variable approach to the difficult p = 2 situation. The theoretical results are used in an example involvilng different types of instrumenlts for measuring human lung capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
V. Barnett (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: